I'm not disputing where it can definitively be shown aracer - regardless of who was on/in what fault is fault.
However - you can be the best driver in the world but if a cyclist decides they are going to swerve across a lane without warning how are you going to miss them? Make that a national speed limit road.....
Unless you're proposing massively reducing the speed differential between all road users of all types then the other party should not be automatically at fault.
One rule for cyclists and one rule for everyone else? Is that what you're proposing?
"I'm a cyclist and just because I jumped off the cyclepath and into your lane, its your fault because the laws says so"
As for the "sun in my eyes" excuse - that doesn't wash with me either. The motorcyclist who the young girl killed a while back because despite not being able to see, not hearing the motorbike and not waiting until she could be sure it was clear .... was a friend of mine.
Motorcyclists come right at the bottom of the pile where blame is concerned and are automatically deemed to have been at fault. (reckless, speeding, riding dangerously, etc) even when proof is shown to the contrary.
Cyclists get off lightly in comparison.